Archive for the 'Don Veinot' Category
It is asked, whether he speaks of married women exclusively, for there are some that restrict to them what Paul teaches, on the ground that it does not belong to virgins to be under the authority of a husband. It is however a mistake, for Paul looks beyond this to God’s eternal [...]
it’s not really a surprise that Don Veinot, Karen Campbell, Cynthia Gee and all the rest have sold out to liberalism. I was reminded of this Thursday night as I re-read Dr. Brian Abshires brotherly response to Veinot’s vicious slander of Abshire, Phillips, and Vision Forum.
I will make your commentary study a little easier; [...]
Patriocentrist (n)
1.) a person who believes that a “the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church” and has angered at least one evangelical feminist, usually resulting in a blog, podcast or article(s) being written to mischaracterize what the person in question has said
did John knox speak to the modern ctitics of patriarchy?
January 30, 2008 in 1 Corinthinans 14, 1 Timothy 2, Boerne Christian Assembly, Commentaries, Don Veinot, Doug Phillips, Doug Wilson, Ephesians 5, Feminism, John Calvin, John Gill, John Knox, Monstrous Regiment, Nancy Wilson, Passionate Housewives, Patriarchy, Presidential Election, R.C. Sproul Jr., Scott Brown, Vision Forum, Voddie Baucham, Wagging Tongues, church history, complementarianism, egalitarianism, graceindellible, patriowhat?!?!, submission, thatmom
First, that from a corrupt and venomed fountain can spring no wholesome water. Secondarily, that no person has power to give the thing which does not justly appertain to themselves. [137]But the authority of a woman is a corrupted fountain, and therefore from her can never spring any lawful officer. She is [...]